Wednesday, May 31, 2006
Saturday, May 27, 2006
Opera 9 Beta 2
The latest version includes bittorrent support, customisable inline address bar searching (type g fred and you get a google search on fred). You can add any search engine, dictionary, download site or wikipedia you wish. Since version 8.5, it has come with voice support (you can control the browser by voice). And now, it has Ajax-based widgets (for time, rss feeds, weather, sport scores, etc etc).
And, since version 8.0, it has been completely free.
Opera is also pushing the boundaries of mobile browsers. Its delivered a series of browsers for pda's and phones - browsers with real functionality (not the IE bastard child). Oh, and for you l337 h@ck3r dudes... its available for most flavours of unix/linux as well. And for you art student, you can get it on Mac.
Saturday, May 20, 2006
Da Vinci Code

I'm not entirely sure what the critics were expecting? Apparently the Da Vinci code got a very lukewarm reception at the Cannes Film Festival, and other media critics were also laying into it. I saw it last night.
I didn't think it was dull, weary or overly long at all. Whilst there were no Oscar winning performances, Hanks did a effective job of portraying the academic type. As usual,Ian McKellen was sparkling. He really brought some effervescence to the screen. Jean Reno was rather subdued in this. Paul Bettany was truy frightening in his role as Silas - an excellent performance, I thought.
The film was not a fast paced thriller - but did include the obligatory car-chase scenes. However, I felt it was more thematically powerful. Religious politics aside, the reverence for history and the "Grail" was powerfully portrayed. And I thought the last scene (Langdon kneeling at the inverted Pyramid in Paris) was fantastic.
In fact generally, the cinematography was captivating, particularly with the famous locations they had to work with. And Ron Howard (the director) was able to move effectively between framing the personal interactions, and framing the grandeur of the location. The score (Hans Zimmerman), whils not being a John Williams epic, I though was very evocative and effective.
The Da Vinci Code is not a mind-blowingly awesome movie. But then, who was expecting that. It was, however, and excellent implementation of the novel into film form. I enjoyed it, and would highly recommend seeing it.
4 Hail Mary (Magdalene)'s out of 5
It has been a while since I read the book, but I felt in movie form, the film promoted faith and reverence for the past. I see this as an excellent thing, where we should attempt to clear away the dogma and imposed "rules" of religion, and seek a true faith. Another key theme of the Da Vinci Code was the repression of women's power in society. And in fact, in many ancient societies, women always have a equal if not more powerful role to men - for example, ancient Hindus, many of the South American societies, and our own Aboriginal societies. I don't think its a bad thing to try and re-empower women in a religious context. And I think the Catholic Church would do well to address some of its past wrongs. As the biggest institutional religion, it would be fantastic if the church could shed the dogmas that have been built into the church for political reasons over 100's of years, and re-embrace what true faith is about. Finding and bringing out the best in humanity.
I would be very interested if people have any comments about this. (Click Comment link below)
- said...
-
The church will be very slow to change. Its dogma is rooted in history and power. However, I believe that even the dogmatic religions can be conducive to 'true faith'. At least, if they themselves are based on principles of love and faith.
The Catholic church still sees Jesus Christ as central in its teachings. To this extent, followers are exposed to his principles of compassion, sacrifice and selfless love. It is my belief that the person who truly seeks God will find Him. They will have an earnest desire to discover the truth. And, if this desire is true, they will find Him even if they have to sift through a pile politically motivated dogma first.
Indeed, such is the power of God's message.
I agree with all that you have said. Still, I believe that the Catholic church deserves some credit for at least making available, on a wide scale, the opportunity to hear God's message. At the very least, in an increasingly secular world, the church has kept religion (and hence faith) somewhat afloat.
Of course, one may argue, that the Catholic church has turned more people away from faith than it has drawn. The answer to such a statement is moot and essentially unknowable. I think this is where faith in the power and divine purpose of a higher being comes in...
So it's interesting that the Catholic church should be so critical of the Code. It's got people talking about, and perhaps loking for, faith. In this respect, the Code seems to be doing an excellent job, dare I say, an even better job than the Catholic church has been doing recently...
Peace out. - said...
-
I've been thinking a lot about the movie since I had the opportunity to watch it with you.
I loved the book and I love the movie. I wasn't expecting it to be a blockbuster - who was? One review even suggested that it was "nothing like Mission Impossible III", as if that was to cast upon the movie some negative connotation.
In reality, the movie was everything the book allowed it to be. A vibrant drama and thriller, with powerful historical references, and discussions about religious ideology. You are meant to leave with your mind massaged, not with your body pumping with adrenaline at the fast cars and beautiful women.
I think perhaps the cleverest device employed in the movie was where Tom Hanks had a discussion saying that religion is what you make it, and that whether or not the Grail myth was true, the Church could manipulate it to encourage more discussion of religious affairs.
It was almost a response to the criticism Brown has copped since the book was released, and it is a noble response. He is essentially saying "use the publicity I provide, and don't be fearful of people believing too much".
I also have a lot of highly religious Catholic friends who tell me that the reason they believe that God lets bad things happen to good people is to test their faith. Surely such reasoning can be used to show acceptance of a book that's premise, if people believe it as true, tests the faith of millions worldwide.
Post a Comment
Wednesday, May 17, 2006
New and creative internet scam
For mine, can I just pay $10, and get the rabbit? I've always wondered what Rabbit tastes like.
- said...
-
It is a great tactic. He'll make a fortune and probably still get to eat the rabbit.
I like the images of the Rabbit sitting on a plate, and in a cooking pot!
Post a Comment
Tuesday, May 16, 2006
Libya
As an aside, I was listening to "All Things Considered" - a current affair radio show on NPR (National Public Radio) in the US (re-broadcast on Radio National). Apparently, the Bush Administration is beginning to lose some of its hard-line support from the ultra-conservative right. And the Republicans will struggle unless the Evangelicans come out at vote - like that did in the last 2 elections. As a result, they are driving through a conservative agenda of Judicial appointments and laws (governing abortion, stem cell research and the like). In this haste to re-appease the ultra-right, the Administration will leave the U.S. with a regressive and even more backward (if that is possible) legacy.
Monday, May 15, 2006
Balanced Meal
But seriously - if you ever wanna roast, you CANNOT go past the Weber. Just chuck it all in, and it cooks perfectly!
Friday, May 12, 2006
2006 Budget
But the Government is behaving like someone who has just won the lotto, bought a mansion, a Porsche and is now off on a 1st Class around-the-world trip. Problem is, when they get back, they won't have enough money to pay the electricity bill, or put petrol in the car. What I'm getting at is the commodities boom - its raking in millions of dollars in tax revenue at the moment. Fine. But what happens when it all ends?
Australia will have nothing to show for the years of boom, and leave behind no lasting infrastructure or nation-building improvements. There was not an iota to address the skills shortage in the budget. Nothing for telecoms. Not much for key transport infrastructure.
Right now, we are extremely fortunate. And the Government should be using this windfall to expand the Australian economies capacity. Instead, its being frittered away on political expedient expenditure.
What is even more worriesome, is that whilst Australia's commodities are highly sought after, and we are making a motza, instead of building Australian industry, the Government is encouraging us to purchase more overseas goods. Australia's export debt is running at 6.5% of GDP - a very unsustainable level. Eventually, our borrowings will come back to bite (not to mention the billions of dollars of interest flowing overseas each year!). At a time when our export performance is up, we are INCREASING our overseas debt faster than ever. What will happen if and when the boom ends? We could be setting ourselves up for a major economic disaster.
Furthermore, on interest rates, this budget was highly stimulating - and unless the capacity of the economy, particularly in the workforce, is increased, there will continue to be upward pressure. Demand will not reduce, so the only way to keep downward pressure is to increase the entire economic capacity. I sympathise with Paul Keatings indignation that he set up the modern Australian Economy, and Howard has claimed credit for it. And Labor are doing nothing to correct this perception in the minds of Australians. Somehow, the Liberals are the "good economic managers". No, they are lucky to get in when they did, and have done nothing to better the future of this country. THere is every possibility of a major economic correction, and with the slashed public services, health, education and particularly, IR protections, any downturn will hurt - and will hurt badly. And the resale value on Plasma TV's is probably not going to let you fill your car more than twice.
- said...
-
Like they said, an election budget in a non-election year.
My viewpoint is that this has something to do with the transition of the Liberal Leadership. If you have been given an indication that it will be your last budget, and there is a need to improve your profile, then you might as well spend up big.
Just this week, Howard and Vaile both happened to be out of the country for the week. A coincidence? Hardly. Costello was acting Prime Minister - a very rare occasion considering the division of power with the Nationals.
I say keep an eye out for other moves of Costello's profile raising that seem to have full government endorsement. It may suggest a change of leadership.
As for Federal Labor, I still say go Kevin Rudd. I heard him do a Lateline interview with Tony Jones regarding Mark Vaile's trip to France while the Trade Deal with Iraq Wheat is collapsing. Rudd used all his charisma in front of all the cameras saying:
"Mark, put the Latte down for a sec, get out of your lounging about in Paris, get on a plane, get to Baghdad and sort this mess out. It is your responsibility".
Post a Comment
Wednesday, May 10, 2006
Old drivers
- said...
-
I agree, but what do you propose as an answer?
Mandatory driving checks on people over a certain age?
The government did propose 'M' plates for elderly drivers, but elderly drivers said they believed it stood more "MENACE" not "MATURE" and that they were so against it as a matter of principle that they would prefer to ignore the plates and pay any consequential fines, rather than cause any insult to their sense of dignity.
But at the end of the day, you are right and we just need to have the guts to do what it takes.
The protection of our children's lives is more important than the protection of our pensioner's dignity, in my respectful opinion. - nivcorp said...
-
Hear hear! Although i think my fertilizer option is more cost-effective.
Post a Comment
Sunday, May 07, 2006
Live Garage Session

GET IT WHILE ITS STILL UP: Triple M's Interview and Garage Session with Ed from Live
Thats what I love about Live - its just Ed and his acoustic guitar - and the songs sound FANTASTIC! This is real music - this is what its all about.
God Bless Live.
Just another thing - its interesting that Triple M has changed its targetted demographic from under-40's to older folk. Its pretty much competing with WSFM. And this suits me just fine. I'm not trying to spruke Triple M (well, I sorta am) - but where else can I here a list of songs that goes something like this:
Dolphins Cry - Live
I Was made for Loving you - KISS
Hollywood Nights - Bob Segar
That song by Dido in that song by Emiminem
Thunderstruck - ACDC
Dancing Queen - ABBA
Alive - Pearl Jam
We Built this City - Jefferson Starship
and Bat out of Hell
... all within 1 hour!?! Its like they've copied the playlist from my mp3 player!
Anyway, enough spruiking... but you should see this Live video.
Richard Carleton: 1943-2006
Anyway, before selling out to 60 minutes, it would seem he was a reasonably respectable journalist with the ABC. He famously asked Bob Hawke: "Mr. Hawke could I ask you whether you feel a little embarressed tonight at the blood that's on your hands?" on national TV (of course, whilst he was with the ABC). THat takes guts, and I respect the man. In fact, his career is much like Anakin Skywalker's - he lured from the good side (the ABC) - to the easy path of the Commercial TV. Perhaps somewhere, in Journo's heaven, he is repenting. And then again, maybe not.
Tuesday, May 02, 2006
Were Beazlys comments inappropriate
He probably has a point. But his timing was terrible. I think it was rather inappropriate to be saying such things, when the two blokes were still not to safety. I do believe, however, that there would have been a useful time to make such comments but that time would be much, much later. Perhaps during or after any investigation surrounding the accident.
Beazly's really not making any ground, and these constant gaffs and misjudgements are not helping the ALP.
I'd just like to note however, Bill Shorten of the Mining Workers Union (and recent Labor MP electee), has managed to raise his public profile significantly through the mine disaster. I'm not implying any deliberate cynicism on his part, but he has essentially been the spokesperson for the miners on this issue. And he's handled the issue with sensitivity and thoughfullness. This certainly won't harm the political ambitions of the man sometimes touted as the next Bob Hawke.
- said...
-
It is an interesting point you raised about Beazley's conduct. You can always tell when someone has been in opposition too long, because their sensitivity for what is right, reasonable and just is lost in favour of having a shot at the government, whenever and wherever.
A good point also raised about Shorten. Shorten did the exact opposite to Beazley, saying that questions would need to be answered but that this was not the time, and that every effort should go into ensuring that the miners are safely recovered.
In reality and in practical terms, as someone with rescue experience, I am aware that although discussing the politics of a disaster rarely changes the physical rescue effort, it does have an emotional impact. Why make more people angry in an already emotional situation.
Shorten certainly has a future. He obviously knows how to defuse circumstances infused with emotion.
Post a Comment
Hi! Just want to say what a nice site. Bye, see you soon.
»
What a great site, how do you build such a cool site, its excellent.
»