RU486
2 Points:
1. Legalisation of something doesn't make it mandatory. If people are opposed to abortion, then don't have one. Besides, its legal as a surgical prodedure so if it can be done less intrusively, then all the better.
2. Abbott and Co. have argued that for a drug this important, and with the potential ramifications, the decision should be made by the Minister with the associated Ministerial responsibility to the Parliament, and by proxy, the people of Australia. HAH! This Government has spent most of its time avoiding and indeed eroding any form of ministerial responsibility. If there has been a scandal, the Minister never knew, but its all the fault of the Bureaucrats. Thanks, but I would trust the Medical experts any day over the Government to make these decisisions, and actually be responsible for them.
Comments?
1. Legalisation of something doesn't make it mandatory. If people are opposed to abortion, then don't have one. Besides, its legal as a surgical prodedure so if it can be done less intrusively, then all the better.
2. Abbott and Co. have argued that for a drug this important, and with the potential ramifications, the decision should be made by the Minister with the associated Ministerial responsibility to the Parliament, and by proxy, the people of Australia. HAH! This Government has spent most of its time avoiding and indeed eroding any form of ministerial responsibility. If there has been a scandal, the Minister never knew, but its all the fault of the Bureaucrats. Thanks, but I would trust the Medical experts any day over the Government to make these decisisions, and actually be responsible for them.
Comments?
Post a Comment